;;; -*- Mode: tdl; Coding: utf-8; -*- ;;; ;;; Copyright (c) 1994-2018 ;;; Dan Flickinger, Rob Malouf, Emily M. Bender ;;; see LICENSE for conditions ;;; ;;; letypes.tdl ;;; ;;; Lexical entry types (yield of lextypes hierarchy) ;;; ;;; Created by Dan Flickinger, 15-June-1996 ;;; ;;; $Id: letypes.tdl 7479 2010-02-21 23:11:30Z danf $ ; In the following type names, complements marked with "*" in the type names ; are optional. v_-_it_le := v_-_it_lexent """ It-subj It rains. """ . v_vp_it_le := main_verb & """ It-subj, Comps: VP (inf) It sufficed to wait. """ [ SYNSEM atrans_inf_verb & [ LOCAL.CAT [ VAL.COMPS < [ OPT - ] > ] ] ]. v_np_it_le := v_np_it_lexent """ It-subj, NP complement It rained money in the stock market. """ . v_cp_le := v_cp_lexent """ Cmps S (fin, +/-Q, opt cmplzr) B proved (that) C won. """ . v_cp_comp_le := v_cp_comp_lexent """ Cmps S (fin, +/-Q, obl cmplzr) B didn't mind that C won. """ . ;; DPF 2022-06-24 - Not used, so comment out. Now have separate type for ;; question-CP complement. #| v_cp_fin-inf_le := main_verb & """ Cmps S (fin/inf, +/-Q) B forgot whether to jump. """ [ SYNSEM cp_fin_inf_intrans_verb ]. |# v_cp_fin-inf-q_le := v_cp_fin-inf-q_lexent """ Cmps S (fin/inf, +Q), complement not extractable B wonders whether to jump. Who he saw, we wondered. """ . v_cp_fin-inf-q-mob_le := v_cp_fin-inf-q-mob_lexent """ Cmps S (fin/inf, +Q, extractable) What he said, we'll never know. """ . v_cp_fin-inf-q-mc_le := v_cp_fin-inf-q-mc_lexent """ Cmps S (fin/inf, +Q), allows main clause question complements B asks, why is the sky blue? """ . ;; DPF 2018-04-29 - Prevent these from undergoing the CP-frag lexical rule, ;; to avoid apparently spurious ambiguity. ;; v_cp_prop_le := v_cp_prop_lexent """ Cmps S (fin/inf, -Q, opt cmplzr) B hoped (that) C won. """ . v_cp_bse-prop_le := v_cp_bse-prop_lexent """ Cmps S (fin/inf, -Q, opt cmplzr), base form only B would rather that C didn't leave. """ . v_cp_no-inv_le := v_cp_no-inv_lexent """ Cmps S (fin, +/-Q, opt cmplzr), no inverted quote B marked that we won. """ . v_cp_nfin_le := v_cp_nfin_lexent """ Cmps S (head nonfin) Beware that C doesn't win. """ . ; "find": "I find that Kim has left" but "*I find Kim has left" v_cp_comp-prop_le := main_verb & """ Cmps S (fin, -Q, obl cmplzr) B resented that C won. """ [ SYNSEM cp_only_prop_intrans_verb ]. ; look/seem like v_cp_like_le := v_cp_like_lexent """ Cmps S (fin, -!, 'like' cmplzr) B looked like she won. """ . ;; inform v_np-cp_le := v_np-cp_lexent """ Cmps NP,S (fin, +/-Q) B informed C that D won. """ . ;; DPF 2016-08-26 - This type is subsumed by the more general ;; v_cp_fin-inf-q-mc_le which also admits *we asked them what to do* ;; DPF 2017-10-07 - Well, no. This type takes two complements, an NP and a CP, ;; while v_cp_fin-inf-q-mc_le only takes one complement, a CP. Sigh. ;; DPF 2020-04-21 - Block cp-frag lexical rule, since it ignores whether the ;; first (NP) complement is obligatory. ;; ; ask, [MC -] CP complement, embedded yes/no question v_np-cp_q_le := v_np-cp_q_lexent """ Cmps NP,S (fin, +Q, MC-, INV+) B asked C `did you win?' """ . ; ask, [MC +] CP complement v_np-cp_q-mc_le := v_np-cp_q-mc_lexent """ Cmps NP,S (fin, +Q, MC+, inverted) B asked C `who did you admire' """ . ; persuade v_np-cp_prop_le := v_np-cp_prop_lexent """ Cmps NP,S (fin, -Q) B persuaded C that D won. """ . ; tell: tell me that they won v_np-cp_fin-inf_le := v_np-cp_fin-inf_lexent """ Cmps NP,S (fin/inf, +/-Q) B told C that they won B told C who won """ . ; question v_np-cp_fin-inf-q_le := v_np-cp_fin-inf-q_lexent """ Cmps NP,S (fin/inf, +Q) B questioned C whether to jump. B questioned C whether he jumped. """ . ; ask, prefer 'ask that he be released' v_cp_sbjnct_le := v_cp_sbjnct_lexent """ Cmps S (bse, subjunctive mood) B required that C be here. """ . ; rather 'would rather that he be released' v_cp_bse-sbjnct_le := v_cp_bse-sbjnct_lexent """ Cmps S (bse, subjunctive mood), base form only B would rather that C be here. """ . ;; Hack for Sherlock, archaic English ; remark 'That be the house, he remarked' v_cp_sbjnct-xtr_le := v_cp_sbjnct-xtr_lexent """ Cmps S (bse, subjunctive mood, extractable) That be the house, he remarked. """ . ; ask, prefer 'ask that he be released' v_cp_sbjnct-fin_le := v_cp_sbjnct-fin_lexent """ Cmps S (fin, subjunctive mood) B required that C be here. """ . ; rather 'would rather that he were released' v_cp_bse-sbjnct-fin_le := v_cp_bse-sbjnct-fin_lexent """ Cmps S (fin, subjunctive mood), base form only B would rather that C were released """ . ; wait v_cp_inf-only_le := v_cp_inf-only_lexent """ Cmps S (inf, +/-Q) B waited for C to arrive. """ . ; try v_vp_seq_le := v_vp_seq_lexent """ Cmps VP, s-equi B intended to win. """ . ; refrain from v_vp_seq-from_le := v_vp_seq-from_lexent """ Cmps VP, s-equi, from-VP B refrained from smoking. """ . v_prd_seq_le := v_prd_seq_lexent """ Cmps Pred-phr, s-equi B remained doubtful. """ . v_prd_seq-idm_le := v_prd_seq-idm_lexent """ Cmps Pred-phr, s-equi, idiom B made sure that C won. """ . v_prd_seq-va_le := v_prd_seq-va_lexent """ Cmps VP or AP, s-equi B became frustrated. """ . ; run low (on X) v_ap_seq_le := v_ap_seq_lexent """ Cmps Adj-phr, s-equi B proved competent. """ . v_ap_seq-idm_le := v_ap_seq_idm_lexent """ Cmps Adj-phr, s-equi B proved competent. """ . ; want into v_pp_seq_le := v_pp_seq_lexent """ Cmps PP, s-equi B wanted into the game. """ . v_pp_seq-e_le := v_pp_seq-e_lexent """ Cmps PP (sem empty), s-equi My battery shows as empty. """ . v_pp_as_le := v_pp_as_lexent """ Cmps PP-as, s-equi The answer counts as correct. """ . ; stop working ; go shopping v_vp_seq-prp_le := v_vp_seq-prp_lexent """ Cmps VP (pres prtcpl), s-equi B loves playing chess. """ . ; help v_vp_seq-bse_le := v_vp_seq-bse_lexent """ Cmps VP (base form), s-equi B helped finish the paper. """ . ; 'I will go read', 'Go read' '*He went read' v_vp_seq-go_le := v_vp_seq-go_lexent """ Base form, Cmps VP (base) s-equi B will go play chess. """ . ; 'We needn't stay' but "*He needs not stay", "*We will need not stay" ; cf. "He needn't stay" (irreg) ;; DPF 2024-04-30 - Duplicates constraints of v_vp_mdl-n_le #| v_vp_ssr-n3sg_le := v_vp_ssr-n3sg_lexent """ Non-3sg, Cmps VP (base), raising We needn't wait here. """ . |# ; "need only" v_vp_ssr-n3sg-r_le := v_vp_ssr-n3sg-r_lexent """ Non-3sg, Cmps VP (base) s-raising, oblig adverb We need only wait here. """ . ; have yet to v_p-vp_ssr_le := v_p-vp_ssr_lexent """ Cmps Prtcl, VP (inf), s-raising B has yet to win. """ . ; they try and find it v_vp_seq-and_le := v_vp_seq-and_lexent """ Pres n3sg, Cmps VP (and), s-equi They try and find it. """ . ; he will try and find it v_vp_seq-and-bse_le := v_vp_seq-and-bse_lexent """ Base form, Cmps VP (and), s-equi B will try and find it. """ . ; couldn't help but notice v_vp_seq-but_le := v_vp_seq-but_lexent """ Base form, Cmps VP (but), s-equi B couldn't help but win. """ . v_np-vp_oeq_le := v_np-vp_oeq_lexent """ Cmps NP,VP (inf), o-equi B invited C to stay. """ . v_np-vp_oeq-ntr_le := v_np-vp_oeq-ntr_lexent """ Cmps NP,VP (inf), o-equi, no passive B got C to stay. """ . ; help v_np-vp_oeq-bse_le := v_np-vp_oeq-bse_lexent """ Cmps NP,VP (base), o-equi B helped C win. """ . v_np-vp_oeq-psv_le := v_np-vp_oeq-psv_lexent """ Cmps NP,VP (inf), o-equi, only passive complement The teacher promised the students to be allowed to play outside. """ . v_np-prd_oeq_le := v_np-prd_oeq_lexent """ Cmps NP,Pred-phr, o-equi B proved C wrong. """ . v_np-ap_oeq_le := v_np-ap_oeq_lexent """ Cmps NP,Adj-phr, o-equi B imagined C taller. """ . ; have x ready ; have x in stock ; I want x confirmed ; get x ready v_np-prd_oeq-ntr_le := v_np-prd_oeq-ntr_lexent """ Cmps NP,Prd-phr, o-equi, no psv B wanted C ready. """ . ; I have X to get rid of v_np-vpslnp_oeq_le := v_np-vpslnp_oeq_lexent """ Cmps NP and VP/NP, o-equi B had C to talk to. """ . ; prevent X from Ving v_np-vp_oeq-from_le := v_np-vp_oeq-from_lexent """ Cmps NP,VP (prprt, from), o-equi B excused C from playing. """ . ; promise v_np-vp_aeq-ntr_le := v_np-vp_aeq-ntr_lexent """ Cmps NP,VP (inf), a-equi, no psv B promised C to win. """ . ; use X to do Y v_np-vp_aeq_le := v_np-vp_aeq_lexent """ Cmps NP,VP (inf), a-equi B used C to reach D. """ . ; ask X to be allowed to Y v_np-vp_aeq-psv_le := v_np-vp_aeq-psv_lexent """ Cmps NP,VP (inf), a-equi, passive VP complement only B asked C to be allowed to leave. """ . ; kim took too long to arrive v_np-vp_aeq-noel_le := v_np-vp_aeq-noel_lexent """ Cmps NP,VP (inf), a-equi, no ell B took an hour to win. """ . ; have trouble sleeping v_np-vp_aeq-prp_le := v_np-vp_aeq-prp_lexent """ Cmps NP,VP (prprt), a-equi B had trouble sleeping. """ . ; turn out to v_p-vp_seq_le := v_p-vp_seq_lexent """ Cmps Prtcl,VP, s-equi B turned out to be wrong. """ . ; keep on driving v_p-vp_prp_le := v_p-vp_prp_lexent """ Cmps Prtcl,VP B kept on winning. """ . v_p-cp_le := v_p-cp_lexent """ Cmps Prtcl,S(fin, +/-Q, opt cmp) B found out (that) C won. """ . v_p-pp*-cp_le := main_verb & """ Cmps Prtcl,PP(opt,sel),Scomp B pointed out to C that S. """ [ SYNSEM particle_pp_cp_verb & [ LKEYS [ --COMPKEY #cmin, --+COMPKEY #cmin ] ] ]. v_p-vp_oeq_le := v_p-vp_oeq_lexent """ Cmps Prtcl,VP, o-equi B geared up C to win. """ . v_pp-vp_oeq_le := v_pp-vp_oeq_lexent """ Cmps PP(sel),VP, o-equi B appealed to C to win. """ . v_pp-vp_oeq-bse_le := v_pp-vp_oeq-bse_lexent """ Cmps PP(sel),VP, o-equi B listened to C sing. """ . v_pp*-vp_oeq_le := v_pp*-vp_oeq_lexent """ Cmps optional PP(sel),VP, o-equi B signaled (to C) to open the door. """ . ;; leave it to kim to arrange the meeting v_it-pp-vp_oeq_le := v_it-pp-vp_oeq_lexent """ Cmps Expl-it,PP,VP, o-equi B left it to C to hire D. """ . ;; consider it a privilege to hire D v_it-np-vp_aeq_le := v_it-np-vp_aeq_lexent """ Cmps Expl-it,NP,VP, anom-equi B considers it a privilege to hire D """ . ;; arrange (with kim) to meet her v_pp-vp_seq_le := v_pp-vp_seq_lexent """ Cmps PP,VP, s-equi B arranged with C to stay. """ . ;; arrange it with kim to meet her v_it-pp-vp_seq_le := v_it-pp-vp_seq_lexent """ Cmps Expl-it,PP,VP s-equi B arranged it with C to X. """ . ;; *it bothers kim that sally left*; and by lex rule: *it bothers kim to go* v_np-cp_it-s_le := v_np-cp_it-s_lexent """ It-subj, Cmps NP,S(fin/inf) It bothered B that C won. """ . ; ticks NP off that S v_np-p-cp_it-s_le := v_np-p-cp_it-s_lexent """ It-subj, Cmps NP,ptcl,S It ticked him off that we won. """ . ;; That Kim lost suggests that Sandy won. ;; It suggests that Sandy won that Kim lost. v_cp-cp_it-s_le := v_cp-cp_it-s_lexent """ It-subj, S ,S That B lost suggests that C won. """ . ; cost v_np-np-cp_it-s_le := v_np-np-cp_it-s_lexent """ It-subj, Cmps NP,NP,S(fin/inf) It cost B $5 for C to go. """ . ; make (?) v_np-np-cp_it-ob_le := v_np-np-cp_it-ob_lexent """ It-subj, Cmps NP,NP,S(fin/inf) It makes Kim the winner that the horse died. """ . ; matter v_np-pp*-cp_it-s_le := v_np-pp*-cp_it-s_lexent """ It-subj, Cmps NP,PP,S(fin) It matters a lot to Kim that S. """ . ; take: 'took him ten minutes to leave' v_np*-np-vp_it-s_le := v_np*-np-vp_it-s_lexent """ It-subj, Cmps NP,NP,VP It took B an hour to go. """ . ; take: 'took (him) until Friday to leave' v_np*-pp-cp_it-s-inf_le := v_np*-pp-cp_it-s-inf_lexent """ It-subj, Cmps NP,PP,inf-VP-or-CP It took B until Friday to leave. """ . ; 'it advances our cause (a lot) to take this step" ; "it will cost us (a lot) to win" v_np-np*-vp_it-s_le := v_np-np*-vp_it-s_lexent """ It-subj, Cmps NP,(NP),VP It cost B ($5) to go. """ . ; call v_it-pp-cp_le := v_it-pp-cp_lexent """ Cmps it,PP,S(fin) He called it to their attention that S """ . ; cost/take v_np-np-vpslnp_tgh_le := v_np-np-vpslnp_tgh_lexent """ subj,Cmps NP,NP,VP/NP The book took (B) an hour to read. """ . ; make (only) v_np-prd-cp_it-s_le := v_np-prd-cp_it-s_lexent """ It-subj, Cmps NP,PrdP ,S(fin/inf) It made B happy for C to go. """ . ;; it seems (to kim) that sandy left v_pp*-cp_it-s_le := v_pp*-cp_it-s_lexent """ It-subj, Cmps (PP),S(fin) It seems to B that K won. """ . ;; it occurred *(to me) that Sandy left v_pp-cp_it-s_le := v_pp-cp_it-s_lexent """ It-subj, Cmps PP,S(fin) It occurred to B to look. """ . ;; it looks (to kim) like Sandy left v_pp*-cp_like_le := v_pp*-cp_like_lexent """ It-subj, Cmps (PP),S(like) It felt (to B) like K won. """ . ;; It doesn't matter who stays v_pp*-cp_it-unsp_le := v_pp*-cp_it-unsp_lexent """ It-subj, Cmps (PP),S(+/-Q) It mattered whether S won. """ . ;; It dawned on Kim that ... v_pp-cp_it-s-e_le := v_pp-cp_it-s-e_lexent """ It-subj, Cmps PP,S(fin, no to) It dawned on B that K won. """ . ; it turns out that kim arrived v_p-cp_it-s_le := v_p-cp_it-s_lexent """ It-subj, Cmps Prtcl,S It turned out that S won. """ . ; It follows that ... v_cp_it-s_le := v_cp_it-s_lexent """ It-subj, Cmps S It followed that S won. """ . ; it would help/wouldn't hurt to know ... v_vp_it-s_le := v_vp_it-s_lexent """ It-subj, Cmps VP It doesn't pay to grumble. """ . ; bet v_np-np-cp_le := v_np-np-cp_lexent """ Cmps NP,NP,S B bet C $5 that S won. """ . ; report to v_pp*-cp_le := v_pp*-cp_lexent """ Cmps PP(sel, opt),S non-Q B reported to C that D won. """ . ; say of NP that S v_pp-cp_le := v_pp-cp_lexent """ Cmps oblig PP, S non-Q B said of C that she won. """ . ; say to v_pp*-cp_fin-imp_le := v_pp*-cp_fin-imp_lexent """ Cmps PP(sel, opt),S(fin/inf), allow imperatives B said to C that D won. """ . ; predict v_pp*-cp_unsp_le := v_pp*-cp_unsp_lexent """ Cmps PP(sel, opt),S(fin/inf, +/-Q), B predicted whether C would win. """ . v_pp*-cp_fin_le := v_pp*-cp_fin_lexent """ Cmps PP(sel, opt),S(fin) B joked to C that D won. """ . v_pp-cp_fin_le := v_pp-cp_fin_lexent """ Cmps PP(sel, oblig),S(fin) B impressed on C that D won. """ . v_pp*-cp_inf_le := v_pp*-cp_inf_lexent """ Cmps PP(sel, oblig),S(inf) B pleaded (with C) for D to be hired. """ . ; 'see to it that X' v_pp-it-cp_le := v_pp-it-cp_lexent """ Cmps PP(sel,expl-it),S(fin) B saw to it that C won. """ . ; would like v_np-vp_sor-ntr_le := v_np-vp_sor-ntr_lexent """ Cmps NP,VP, s-o-raising, no psv B wanted it to rain. """ . v_np-vp_sor_le := v_np-vp_sor_lexent """ Cmps NP,VP, s-o-raising B expected it to rain. """ . v_np-vp_bse_le := v_np-vp_bse_lexent """ Cmps NP,VP(bse), s-o-raising B heard it rain. """ . ; make: 'kim made it clear that sandy arrived' v_np-prd_sor_le := v_np-prd_sor_lexent """ Cmps NP,Adj, s-o-raising The smog made it cloudy. """ . v_np-prd_sor-pp_le := v_np-prd_sor-pp_lexent """ Cmps NP,Prdp, s-o-raising They declared him in default on the loan. """ . v_np-np_le := v_np-np_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl),NP(obl), dative alt B gave C the book. """ . ; 'leave (bequeath)' v_np-np*_le := v_np-np*_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl),NP(opt), dative alt B left the book to C. """ . v_np*-np_le := v_np*-np_lexent """ Cmps NP(opt),NP(oblig), dative alt B paid C the money. """ . v_np-np_only_le := v_np-np_only_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl),NP(obl), no dat alt B declared C the winner. """ . v_np*-np_only_le := v_np*-np_only_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl),NP(opt), no dat alt The book will cost (Kim) a great deal. """ . v_np*-np*_only_le := v_np*-np*_only_lexent """ Cmps NP(opt),NP(opt), no dat alt B asked C the question. """ . v_np-np_idm_le := v_np-np_idm_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl),NP(obl), idiom B called it quits. """ . ;; talk v_pp*-pp*_le := v_pp*-pp*_lexent """ Cmps PP(opt),PP(opt) B lied to C about D. """ . v_pp-pp_le := v_pp-pp_lexent """ Cmps PP(obl),PP(obl) B ranged from C to D. """ . v_pp-pp_e_le := v_pp-pp_e_lexent """ Cmps PP(obl),PP(sel,obl) B reported on C to D. """ . v_pp-pp_e-e_le := v_pp-pp_e-e_lexent """ Cmps PP(sel,obl),PP(sel,obl) B thinks of C as a friend. """ . v_np*-pp*-ppto_le := v_np*-pp*-ppto_lexent """ Cmps NP(opt),PP(sel,opt),PP(to) B changed C from D to E. """ . v_np-pp*-ppto_le := v_np-pp*-ppto_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl),PP(sel,opt),PP(to) B converted C from D to E. """ . v_np-pp*-ppfor_le := v_np-pp*-ppfor_lexent """ Cmps NP(oblig),PP(sel,opt),PP(for) B paid money to C for D. """ . v_pp_e_le := v_pp_e_lexent """ Cmps PP(sel,obl) B looked after C. """ . v_pp_e-nopsv_le := v_pp_e-nopsv_lexent """ Cmps PP(sel,obl), no prep-passive Nothing came of it. Nothing was come of. """ . v_pp_e3_le := main_verb & """ Cmps PP(sel,obl) B gave to worthy causes """ [ SYNSEM empty_prep_intrans_arg3_verb & [ LOCAL.CAT [ VAL.COMPS < [ OPT - ] > ], LKEYS [ --COMPKEY #cmin, --+COMPKEY #cmin ] ] ]. v_pp_refl-idm_le := v_pp_refl-idm_lexent """ PP complement, reflexive idiom B came out of her shell. """ . v_np-pp_e_le := v_np-pp_e_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl),PP(sel.obl) B compared C with D. """ . v_np*-pp_e_le := v_np*-pp_e_lexent """ Cmps NP(opt),PP(sel,obl) B separated C from D. """ . v_np-pp*_e-imp_le := v_np-pp*_e-imp_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl),PP(sel,opt), hd_imp_c Thank you for D. """ . ; take Kim for granted v_np-pp_e-idm_le := v_np-pp_e-idm_lexent """ NP and empty-PP complements, idiom Cmps NP(obl),PP(sel,obl), idiom B took C for granted. """ . v_np-pp_e-refl-idm_le := v_np-pp_e-refl-idm_lexent """ Cmps reflexive NP(obl),PP(sel,obl), idiom B cast her lot with C. """ . v_np-pp_e-refl2-idm_le := v_np-pp_e-refl2-idm_lexent """ Cmps reflexive NP(obl),reflexive PP(sel,obl), idiom B wore his heart on his sleeve. """ . ; came into being v_pp_e-idm_le := main_verb & """ Cmps NP(obl), idiom B came into being. """ [ SYNSEM empty_prep_intrans_verb & [ LKEYS [ --COMPKEY #cmin, --+COMPKEY #cmin ] ], IDIOM + ]. ; 'interest kim in' v_np-pp_e-ntr_le := v_np-pp_e-ntr_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl),PP(sel,obl), no psv B interested C in D. """ . ;; 'prefer it if ...' v_it-cp_le := v_it-cp_lexent """ Cmps Expl-it,S(fin,+/-Q) B prefers it if C wins. """ . ;; 'hate it that ...' v_it-cp_prop-c_le := v_it-cp_prop-c_lexent """ Cmps Expl-it,S(fin,-Q),obl cplzr B hates it that C won. """ . ;; 'take it (that) ...' v_it-cp_prop_le := v_it-cp_prop_lexent """ Cmps Expl-it,S(fin,-Q) B took it (that) C won. """ . #| ; 'make it clear that ...' v_it-prd_le := v_it-prd_lexent """ Cmps Expl-it,Pred-phr B made it clear that C won """ . |# v_np_le := v_np_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl) B chased C. """ . v_np*_le := v_np*_lexent """ Cmps NP(opt) B cleaned the room. """ . ;; DPF 2017-04-27 - No longer see why we would restrict these verbs (often ;; alternating with inchoatives) to exclude gerund complements, since we ;; need them for e.g. *they increased spending*. So changed [HEAD basic_noun] ;; to supnoun on complement. ;; DPF 2020-05-14 - Perhaps a confusion about the name: noger here means the ;; verb itself does not undergo the (nominal) gerund lexical rule. But we do ;; need a lexical verb type that excludes gerund complements, as for *seem* ;; in *He seemed arriving*, and does not passivize. ;; v_np_noger_le := v_np_noger_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl,nongerund) B continued the tour. """ . v_np*_noger_le := v_np*_noger_lexent """ Cmps NP(opt,nongerund) B blended until the milkshake was smooth. """ . v_np_do-be_le := basic_main_verb_sans_key & """ Cmps NP(gap), only for do (but not doing) in do-be construction The first thing B did was hire C. """ [ SYNSEM do_be_verb & [ LOCAL.CAT.HEAD [ VFORM non_prespart, INV - ], LKEYS.KEYREL.ARG2.IFORM non_prespart ], INFLECTD - ]. v_np_do-ing-be_le := basic_main_verb_sans_key & """ Cmps NP(gap), only for doing in do-be construction The thing B was doing was hiring C. """ [ INFLECTD -, SYNSEM do_be_verb & [ LOCAL.CAT.HEAD [ VFORM prp, INV - ], LKEYS.KEYREL.ARG2.IFORM prp ] ]. v_np_done-be_le := basic_main_verb_sans_key & """ Cmps NP(gap), only for do (but not doing) in do-be construction The first thing that must be done is hire C. """ [ SYNSEM do_be_verb_passive & [ LOCAL.CAT.HEAD.INV -, LKEYS.KEYREL.ARG2.IFORM non_prespart ], INFLECTD + ]. ;; DPF 2022-05-30 - Changed the only instance "beware" to be of type ;; v_np*_n3s-bse_le, since non-finite was the wrong constraint for a verb that ;; can be imperative or a complement of modals. #| v_np*_nfin_le := main_verb & """ Cmps NP(opt), nonfin B should beware C. """ [ SYNSEM np_trans_nfin_verb ]. |# v_np_n3s-bse_le := v_np_n3s-bse_lexent """ Cmps NP(oblig), non-3sg or base They underly C. """ . v_np*_n3s-bse_le := v_np*_n3s-bse_lexent """ Cmps NP(opt), non-3sg or base Beware the unseen dangers. You should beware the risks. """ . v_np_refl-idm_le := v_np_refl-idm_lexent """ Cmps reflexive NP, idiom We wracked our brains. """ . v_p-np_refl-idm_le := main_verb_mliszt & """ Cmps particle + reflexive NP, idiom We made up our minds. """ [ SYNSEM np_particle_idiom_verb & [ LKEYS [ --COMPKEY #cmin, --+COMPKEY #cmin ] ], IDIOM + ]. v_np_sg-idm_le := v_np_sg-idm_lexent """ Cmps non-reflexive NP, singular, idiom He kicked the bucket. """ . v_np_idm_le := v_np_idm_lexent """ Cognate object verbs He slept the sleep of the just """ . v_np_pl-idm_le := v_np_pl-idm_lexent """ Cmps non-reflexive NP, plural, idiom He sucked eggs. """ . ; 'elected him president' v_np-nb_le := v_np-nb_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl),Nbar(obl) We elected B president. """ . ; 'see picture, page 2' v_nb-np*_imp_le := v_nb-np*_imp_lexent """ Cmps Nbar(obl), NP(opt), hd_imp_c See pamphlet, page 2. """ . v_pp_e-nfin_le := main_verb & """ Cmps NP(obl), nonfin B should beware of C. """ [ SYNSEM empty_prep_intrans_bse_verb ]. v_np-pp_le := v_np-pp_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl),PP(obl) B named C after D. """ . ;; takes dir_state_modable_rel oblique complement. ;; put (takes variety of PP complements, so avoid chart dependency filter) v_np-pp_prop_le := v_np-pp_prop_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl),PP(obl), state rslt B put C on D. """ . ;; change one's mind about v_np-pp_nmod_le := v_np-pp_nmod_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl),PP(obl, nmodifier) We change our mind about C """ . v_np-pp_dir_le := v_np-pp_dir_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl),PP(dir, obl) B raced C into D. """ . v_np-pp_oeq-as_le := v_np-pp_oeq-as_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl),PP-prd(obl,as), o-equi B classifies C as important. """ . v_pp-pp_oeq-as_le := v_pp-pp_oeq-as_lexent """ Cmps PP(obl,empty),PP-prd(obl,as), o-equi B thinks of C as important. """ . v_np_ntr_le := v_np_ntr_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl), no psv, no attr-adj for -ing B remains C. """ . v_np*_ntr_le := v_np*_ntr_lexent """ Cmps NP(opt), no psv B promised C. """ . v_np_ntr-nogap_le := v_np_ntr_lexent & """ Cmps NP(obl), no psv, no attr-adj for -ing, no gap B > C. """ [ SYNSEM.LOCAL.CAT.VAL.COMPS.FIRST canonical_synsem ]. v_np_ntr-noger_le := main_verb & """ Cmps NP(obl), no psv, no gerund complement B seemed the best choice. B seemed arriving. """ [ SYNSEM np_non_trans_verb & [ LOCAL.CAT [ VAL.COMPS < [ OPT -, LOCAL.CAT.HEAD basic_noun] > ] ] ]. ; 'become' v_np_id_le := v_np_id_lexent """ Cmps NP, become B became C. """ . ; 'become president' v_nb_le := v_nb_lexent """ Cmps Nbar(obl,pred nom) B became president. """ . ; spell `supersede' v_nb_quote_le := v_nb_quote_lexent """ Cmps Nbar(obl,pred nom,quoted-word) B can't spell `supersede'. """ . ; 'become obvious that Kim arrived.' v_prd_ssr-va_le := v_prd_ssr-va_lexent """ Cmps VP or AP, subj-raising, expl-it subj It became obvious that Kim arrived. """ . ; 'stood guard' v_nb_idm_le := v_nb_idm_lexent """ Cmps Nbar(obl), idiom B stood guard. """ . v_np-pp_seq-as_le := v_np-pp_seq-as_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl),PP(obl,as), s-equi B struck C as without D. """ . v_p_le := v_p_lexent """ Cmps Prtcl B turned up. """ . v_p_3only_le := v_p_3only_lexent """ Cmps Prtcl, subj 3per Something is going on. """ . v_p-np_le := v_p-np_lexent """ Cmps Prtcl,NP(obl), order alt B picked up the book. """ . v_np-p_le := v_np-p_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl),Prtcl, no order alt We will see you around. """ . v_np-p_idm_le := v_np-p_idm_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl),Prtcl, no order alt We will see you around. """ . v_p-nb_le := v_p-nb_lexent """ Cmps Prtcl,Nbar B ended up president. """ . v_p-prd_le := v_p-prd_lexent """ Cmps Prtcl,Pred-phr B ended up sick. """ . v_p-pp_le := v_p-pp_lexent """ Cmps Prtcl,PP(obl) B caught up on C. """ . v_p-pp_e_le := v_p-pp_e_lexent """ Cmps Prtcl,PP(obl,sel) B ran out of C. """ . v_p-pp*_e_le := main_verb & """ Cmps Prtcl,PP(opt,sel) B heard back from C. """ [ SYNSEM particle_empty_pp_verb & [ LOCAL.CAT [ VAL.COMPS < synsem, [ OPT + ] > ], LKEYS [ --COMPKEY #cmin, --+COMPKEY #cmin ] ] ]. ; 'boils it down to' v_p-np-pp_to_le := v_p-np-pp_to_lexent """ Cmps Prtcl,NP(obl),PP(obl,to) B made out the check to C. """ . ; 'made up of' v_p-np-pp_of_le := main_verb & """ Cmps Prtcl,NP(obl),PP(obl,of) This is made up of bricks. """ [ SYNSEM np_particle_ppof_verb ]. v_p-np-pp_for_le := v_p-np-pp_for_lexent """ Cmps Prtcl,NP(obl),PP(obl,for) B traded in B for C. """ . v_p-np-pp_from_le := main_verb & """ Cmps Prtcl,NP(obl),PP(obl,from) B separated out C from D. """ [ SYNSEM np_particle_ppfrom_verb ]. v_p-np-pp_in_le := v_p-np-pp_in_lexent """ Cmps Prtcl,NP(obl),PP(obl,in) B was caught up in the debate. """ . v_p-np-pp_on_le := main_verb & """ Cmps Prtcl,NP(obl),PP(obl,on) B fobbed this off on C. """ [ SYNSEM np_particle_ppon_verb ]. v_p-np-pp_as_le := main_verb & """ Cmps Prtcl,NP(obl),PP(obl,as) B singled him out as C. """ [ SYNSEM np_particle_ppas_verb ]. v_p-np-pp_as-oeq_le := main_verb & """ Cmps Prtcl,NP(obl),PP(obl,as) B showed him up as foolish """ [ SYNSEM np_particle_ppas_oeq_verb ]. v_np-p-np_le := v_np-p-np_lexent """ Cmps NP,Prtcl,NP B gave C back the book. """ . v_np-p-cp_idm_le := v_np-p-cp_idm_lexent """ Cmps NP,Prtcl,CP or VP, fin or inf, maybe only for idioms B made up her mind that S. B made up her mind to leave. """ . v_np-p-cp_le := main_verb & """ Cmps NP,Prtcl,CP or VP, fin or inf B made up her mind that S. B made up her mind to leave. """ [ SYNSEM np_particle_cp_verb & [ LOCAL.CAT.VAL.KCMP.LOCAL.CAT s_cat_unspec, LKEYS [ --COMPKEY #cmin, --+COMPKEY #cmin ] ] ]. v_np-p-vp_le := v_np-p-vp_lexent """ Cmps NP,Prtcl,VP inf B made C out to be crazy. """ . v_pp_arg_le := v_pp_arg_lexent """ Cmps PP, argmt coercion B suggested on Monday. """ . v_pp_gap_le := v_pp_gap_lexent """ Cmps PP, obligatorily extracted They sleep whenever they want. """ . v_pp_le := v_pp_lexent """ Cmps PP(obl) The cat felt like a dog. """ . v_pp*_dir_le := v_pp*_dir_lexent """ Cmps PP(opt,dir) B crept into the room. """ . v_pp_dir_le := v_pp_dir_lexent """ Cmps PP(obl,dir) B slipped into the room. """ . v_pp_dir-noj_le := v_pp_dir-noj_lexent """ Cmps PP(obl,dir), no attrib adj for -ing form B got out of the room the getting contestant """ . v_pp*_le := v_pp*_lexent """ Cmps PP(opt) B starred in C """ . v_pp_unacc_le := v_pp_unacc_lexent """ Cmps PP(opt), unacc The seed grew into a tree. """ . v_pp_psv_le := v_pp_psv_lexent """ Cmps PP, passive only This bed was slept in """ . v_vp_ssr_le := v_vp_ssr_lexent """ Cmps VP(inf), s-s-rais There failed to be a link. """ . v_vp_ssr-prp_le := v_vp_ssr-prp_lexent """ Cmps VP(prp), s-s-rais It finished raining. """ . ; 'have to': no imperative "*Have to leave!" v_vp_ssr-nimp_le := v_vp_ssr-nimp_lexent """ Cmps VP(inf), s-s-rais, no hd_imp_c There tend to be problems. """ . v_pp-vp_ssr_le := v_pp-vp_ssr_lexent """ Cmps PP(opt),VP(inf), s-s-rais It seems to B to be windy. """ . ; DPF 29-aug-07 - These verbs like "become" supposedly don't combine with ; predicative VPs, but stative passives often seem to be fine, ; as in ; "This picture became damaged/associated with Picasso" or ; "We became inspired by the music." Rather than adding a lexical rule to ; convert them to predicative adjs, consider a HEAD supertype of basic_adj ; and passive-verb. FIX. v_ap-pp_seq_le := v_ap-pp_seq_lexent """ Cmps AP,PP(opt), s-equi B sounded good to C. """ . v_pp-pp_seq_le := v_pp-pp_seq_lexent """ Cmps PP(like),PP(opt), s-equi B sounded like C to D. """ . v_prd-pp_seq_le := v_prd-pp_seq_lexent """ Cmps Pred-phr,PP(opt), s-equi B seemed good to C. """ . ; feel good about v_ap-pp_about_le := v_ap-pp_about_lexent """ Cmps AP,PP(about, sel), s-equi B felt good about C. """ . v_np-pp_to_le := v_np-pp_to_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl),PP(obl,to,sel) B attributed C to D. """ . v_np-pp_to-unsp_le := main_verb & """ Cmps NP(obl),PP(obl,to,sel), either Nbar or NP complement of `to' B promoted C to president/the presidency. """ [ SYNSEM empty_prep_trans_verb & [ LOCAL.CAT [ VAL.COMPS < [ OPT - ], [ OPT - ] > ], LKEYS [ --COMPKEY #cmin, --+COMPKEY #cmin, --OCOMPKEY _to_p_sel_rel & #ocmin, --+OCOMPKEY #ocmin ] ] ]. ;; DPF 2018-12-20 - This type prevented N-V compounds as in "snow-bound" since ;; the optional selected-for PP blocks these. So discard this type, and unfold ;; its instances into two types v_np-pp_to_le and v_np_le. ;; v_np-pp*_to_le := main_verb & """ Cmps NP(obl),PP(opt,to,sel) B converted C to D. """ [ SYNSEM empty_to_trans_verb & [ LOCAL.CAT [ VAL.COMPS < [ OPT - ], [ OPT + ] > ], LKEYS [ --COMPKEY #cmin, --+COMPKEY #cmin ] ] ]. v_np*-pp_to_le := v_np*-pp_to_lexent """ Cmps NP(opt),PP(obl,to,sel) B added C to D. """ . v_np*-pp*_to_le := v_np*-pp*_to_lexent """ Cmps NP(opt),PP(opt,to,sel) B explained C to D. """ . v_-_unacc_le := v_-_unacc_lexent """ No cmps, unaccusative The plate gleamed. """ . v_-_le := v_-_lexent """ No cmps, unergative B arose. """ . v_-_imp_le := v_-_imp_lexent """ No cmps, unergative, hd_imp_c only Begone! """ . v_-_bse_le := v_-_bse_lexent """ No cmps, base form only That will do. """ . v_np_poss_le := v_np_poss_lexent """ Cmps NP, only have B has C. """ . v_np_poss-cx_le := main_verb & """ Cmps NP, only contracted have (no extraction) They've no idea. """ [ SYNSEM poss_verb & [ LOCAL [ CAT [ HEAD.TAM.TENSE present, VAL.COMPS < canonical_synsem > ], AGR.PNG.PN -3s ] ] ]. ;; DPF 19-feb-10 - Prevent "got there" via COMPS..NORM no_rel. ;; DPF 07-apr-10 - No longer remember why we have this, given the ordinary ;; NP-complement get_v2. It does not appear in any of the treebanked data, ;; so let's try living without it, to avoid spurious ambiguity for e.g. ;; "he has got cats" v_np_got_le := norm_nonconj_word & """ Cmps NP, only got B got C. """ [ SYNSEM poss_got_verb ]. v_cp_rkey-bse_le := v_cp_rkey-bse_lexent """ Cmps S, embedded subj tag, base I'll suppose C can, can he """ . v_cp_rkey-3sg_le := v_cp_prop_raise_key_lexent & """ Cmps S, embedded subj tag, 3sing B supposes C can, can't he """ [ SYNSEM cp_prop_raise_key_3sg_verb ]. v_cp_rkey-n3sg_le := v_cp_rkey-n3sg_lexent """ Cmps S, embedded subj tag, non3s We suppose C can, can't he """ . v_cp_rkey-pst_le := v_cp_prop_raise_key_lexent & """ Cmps S, embedded subj tag, past I supposed C is, isn't he """ [ SYNSEM cp_prop_raise_key_pst_verb ]. v_cp_rkey-prp_le := v_cp_prop_raise_key_lexent & """ Cmps S, embedded subj tag, prp I'm supposing C is, is he """ [ SYNSEM cp_prop_raise_key_prp_verb ]. v_cp_rkey-psp_le := v_cp_prop_raise_key_lexent & """ Cmps S, embedded subj tag, psp I've supposed C is, is he """ [ SYNSEM cp_prop_raise_key_psp_verb ]. v_adv_le := v_adv_lexent """ Cmps Adv-phr B did badly. """ . v_np-adv_le := v_np-adv_lexent """ Cmps NP, Adv-phr B put it badly. """ . ; 'made': "Kim made sandy arrive' but "Sandy was made TO arrive' v_vp_sorb-psv_le := v_vp_sorb-psv_lexent """ Cmps VP(inf), psv, s-o-rais B was made to arrive. """ . ; 'rumored': "It was rumored that they had arrived" v_cp_psv_le := v_cp_psv_lexent """ Cmps CP, psv It was rumored that they had arrived. """ . ; 'faded' v_-_psv_le := norm_basic_main_verb & """ No cmps, psv B was faded. """ [ SYNSEM passive_unerg_synsem, INFLECTD + ]. ; 'born' v_-_psv-prd_le := norm_basic_main_verb & """ No cmps, psv, predicative only B was born. The born child cried. """ [ INFLECTD +, SYNSEM passive_unerg_synsem & [ LOCAL.CAT.POSTHD + ], ALTS.ATTRJ - ]. v_-_psv-prd-spr_le := norm_basic_main_verb & """ No cmps, psv, predicative only, obligatory specifier B was as known for this as for that. """ [ INFLECTD +, SYNSEM passive_unerg_synsem & [ LOCAL.CAT [ VAL.SPR.FIRST expressed_synsem, POSTHD + ] ], ALTS.ATTRJ - ]. ; 'surrounded' v_-_psv-with_le := norm_basic_main_verb & """ No cmps, psv, predicative only, oblig with-PP The city was surrounded with mountains. """ [ INFLECTD +, SYNSEM passive_unerg_with_synsem, ALTS.ATTRJ - ]. ;; DPF 2016-09-26 - Removed NORM norm_rel because we want ;; *the Chicago-based team* where the n-v_j-cpd_c rule requires its second dtr ;; to be NORM no_rel. Maybe FIX whatever that constraint was doing. ;; ; 'faded' v_-_psv-att_le := norm_basic_main_verb & """ No cmps, psv, attributive only The flopped issue disappeared. """ [ SYNSEM passive_unerg_synsem & [ LOCAL.CAT [ VAL.SUBJ < canonical_synsem >, POSTHD - ], NONLOC.SLASH.LIST < > ], INFLECTD + ]. ; 'horseback riding' v_-_prp_le := norm_basic_main_verb & """ No cmps, prp only B went horseback riding """ [ SYNSEM unerg_prp_verb, INFLECTD + ]. ;; 'put' - "That was well put", but block in n-v compounds like "*idea-put" ;; Also block depictives via OPT - ;; v_-_psv-ncnh_le := v_-_psv-ncnh_lexent """ No cmps, psv, no n-v-ed cmpnd That was put clearly. """ . ; 'unevaluated (by Abrams)' v_-_psv-neg_le := main_verb_newltop & """ No cmps, psv, neg semantics B was unevaluated. """ [ SYNSEM passive_unerg_neg_synsem, INFLECTD + ]. v_np_thr-s_le := v_np_thr-s_lexent """ Cmps NP, expl-there subj There existed many dogs. """ . v_np_locinv-mv_le := v_np_locinv-mv_lexent """ Cmps NP, loc inversion In the room stood a clock. """ . v_np_locinv-is_le := loc_inv_be_word & """ Cmps NP, loc inversion, aux is In the room is a clock. """ [ SYNSEM.LOCAL [ CAT.HEAD.TAM.TENSE present, AGR.PNG.PN 3s ] ]. v_np_locinv-are_le := loc_inv_be_word & """ Cmps NP, loc inversion, aux are In the room are clocks. """ [ SYNSEM.LOCAL [ CAT.HEAD.TAM.TENSE present, AGR.PNG.PN 3p ] ]. v_np_locinv-was_le := loc_inv_be_word & """ Cmps NP, loc inversion, aux was In the room was a clock. """ [ SYNSEM.LOCAL [ CAT.HEAD.TAM.TENSE past, AGR.PNG.PN 3s ] ]. v_np_locinv-were_le := loc_inv_be_word & """ Cmps NP, loc inversion, aux were In the room were clocks. """ [ SYNSEM.LOCAL [ CAT.HEAD.TAM.TENSE past, AGR.PNG.PN 3p ] ]. v_np_locinv-been_le := basic_loc_inv_be_word & """ Cmps NP, loc inversion, aux were In the room had been clocks. """ [ SYNSEM.LOCAL.CAT.HEAD.VFORM psp ]. v_np_locinv-be_le := v_np_locinv-be_lexent """ Cmps NP, loc inversion, aux be In the room will be clocks. """ . ;; May he always be blessed ;; v_np-vp_imp_le := main_verb_mliszt & """ Cmps NP,VP(bse), imperative only May he always be blessed May there be peace on earth """ [ SYNSEM sorb_verb & [ LOCAL.CAT.HEAD.VFORM imp_vform ] ]. ;; Salutations treated as subjectless sentences ;; "Dear John" v_np_salut_le := v_np_salut_lexent & """ Cmps NP(obl) Dear Kim """ [ SYNSEM.LOCAL.CAT.VAL.COMPS < [ OPT - ] > ]. ;; Salutations treated as subjectless sentences ;; "Sincerely Mary" v_np*_salut_le := v_np_salut_lexent """ Cmps NP(opt) """ . v_np_bse_le := v_np_bse_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl), regular instead of normal irregular morphology We should cost the proposal. """ . v_np_pr-3s_le := v_np_pr-3s_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl), regular instead of normal irregular morphology He always costs the proposals early. """ . v_np_pr-n3s_le := v_np_pr-n3s_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl), regular instead of normal irregular morphology We usually cost the proposal later. """ . v_np_past_le := v_np_past_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl), regular instead of normal irregular morphology We already costed the proposal. """ . v_np_psp_le := v_np_psp_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl), regular instead of normal irregular morphology We have already costed the proposal. """ . v_np_prp_le := v_np_prp_lexent """ Cmps NP(obl), regular instead of normal irregular morphology We are already costing the proposal. """ . ;; DPF 2018-08-24 - For some reason, PET's flop will not compile this file ;; without the following 99-character line preceded by a semicolon: ;; (and similarly for auxverbs.tdl but not lextypes.tdl) ;xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx